<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Biography of Martin Luther	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://conradaskland.com/blog/biography-of-martin-luther/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/biography-of-martin-luther/</link>
	<description>Music Director and Music Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/biography-of-martin-luther/#comment-42262</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/04/biography-of-martin-luther/#comment-42262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes I am, and your welcom :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I am, and your welcom 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: askland		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/biography-of-martin-luther/#comment-42190</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[askland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/04/biography-of-martin-luther/#comment-42190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the notes. Um....I&#039;m guessing you&#039;re Catholic? :) Just a hunch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the notes. Um&#8230;.I&#8217;m guessing you&#8217;re Catholic? 🙂 Just a hunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/biography-of-martin-luther/#comment-42162</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/04/biography-of-martin-luther/#comment-42162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi. I&#039;m not sure whether you wrote the above article or found it somewhere, but at any rate I thought I should let you know that it contains some inaccuracies. Firstly, Martin Luther was inordinarily terrified of God&#039;s wrath. The article notes this but seems to imply that this is due to the beliefs of the Catholic Church. However, Catholicism does not dwell on God as the Angry Judge, and the fact that Luther confessed his sins twenty times a day seems to indicate that he had a deeper problem, one of serious doubt. Many priests recommend confessing one&#039;s sins ONCE A MONTH, and a person who does so ONCE A WEEK is often considered extrodinarily diligent in the matter. Feeling the need to confess them TWENTY TIMES A DAY is an indication that Martin Luther most likly suffered from scrupulosity, a spiritual disorder by which one fears he has sinned though he hasn&#039;t and doubts both his own ability to avoid sinning and God&#039;s forgiveness of his sins.   

Next, the immorality of priests and the pope is mentioned, as well as the selling of indulgences. It&#039;s true. There were many abuses in the Church at that time and even many immoral clergy. However, this fact is apparently offered as a proof that the entire religion is immoral. This is completely illogical, and if one follows this reasoning he must continue thus: Martin Luther was quoted as saying, &quot;Why should not we, with all our weapons, attack ... all the rabble of the Roman Sodom and wash our hands in their blood?&quot; (Christ the King - Lord of History, Anne W. Carroll, p. 221). Obviously, this statement is not in accord with morality. So if an immoral member of the clergy of a religion means that the the religion itself is false or immoral, then Lutheranism must also be rejected as immoral, as well as every other religion known to man, as no clergy can possibly be perfect, except for Christ alone, of course. 

Next, I just wanted to point out that Martin Luther&#039;s interpretation of the verse, &quot;The just will live by faith&quot; was incorrect. St. Paul said, &quot;If I have the faith to move mountains but have not love, then I have nothing.&quot; Good works, which Luther rejected, are nothing but a manifestation of love of God and love of neighbor, and if these two loves are not necessary for salvation, than Jesus was a liar when He gave the Great Commandment: &quot;Love the Lord your God with your whole mind, heart and soul. And the Second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself.&quot; As well, the Epistle of James speaks in detail of the importance of good works. Incidentally, Luther rejected this book of Scripture because he disagreed with its contents. But the above examples prove that Luther was indeed proved wrong by Scripture alone. 

Lastly, Luther is referred to as a great reformer. What did he reform? The Church was crying out to be reformed at that time, yet instead he broke away from it and started his own religion, deciding to deny many fundamental beliefs that all Christians had held since the time of Christ. Christ told His Apostles that He would be with them to the end of time, and if He were with them, He would be with the Church they were put in charge of. If that Church had been teaching incorrect doctrines for over 1500 years (as Luther clearly claimed by abolishing the Mass and most of the Sacraments), then Jesus was a liar. I hope you don&#039;t believe that, because I sure don&#039;t.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I&#8217;m not sure whether you wrote the above article or found it somewhere, but at any rate I thought I should let you know that it contains some inaccuracies. Firstly, Martin Luther was inordinarily terrified of God&#8217;s wrath. The article notes this but seems to imply that this is due to the beliefs of the Catholic Church. However, Catholicism does not dwell on God as the Angry Judge, and the fact that Luther confessed his sins twenty times a day seems to indicate that he had a deeper problem, one of serious doubt. Many priests recommend confessing one&#8217;s sins ONCE A MONTH, and a person who does so ONCE A WEEK is often considered extrodinarily diligent in the matter. Feeling the need to confess them TWENTY TIMES A DAY is an indication that Martin Luther most likly suffered from scrupulosity, a spiritual disorder by which one fears he has sinned though he hasn&#8217;t and doubts both his own ability to avoid sinning and God&#8217;s forgiveness of his sins.   </p>
<p>Next, the immorality of priests and the pope is mentioned, as well as the selling of indulgences. It&#8217;s true. There were many abuses in the Church at that time and even many immoral clergy. However, this fact is apparently offered as a proof that the entire religion is immoral. This is completely illogical, and if one follows this reasoning he must continue thus: Martin Luther was quoted as saying, &#8220;Why should not we, with all our weapons, attack &#8230; all the rabble of the Roman Sodom and wash our hands in their blood?&#8221; (Christ the King &#8211; Lord of History, Anne W. Carroll, p. 221). Obviously, this statement is not in accord with morality. So if an immoral member of the clergy of a religion means that the the religion itself is false or immoral, then Lutheranism must also be rejected as immoral, as well as every other religion known to man, as no clergy can possibly be perfect, except for Christ alone, of course. </p>
<p>Next, I just wanted to point out that Martin Luther&#8217;s interpretation of the verse, &#8220;The just will live by faith&#8221; was incorrect. St. Paul said, &#8220;If I have the faith to move mountains but have not love, then I have nothing.&#8221; Good works, which Luther rejected, are nothing but a manifestation of love of God and love of neighbor, and if these two loves are not necessary for salvation, than Jesus was a liar when He gave the Great Commandment: &#8220;Love the Lord your God with your whole mind, heart and soul. And the Second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself.&#8221; As well, the Epistle of James speaks in detail of the importance of good works. Incidentally, Luther rejected this book of Scripture because he disagreed with its contents. But the above examples prove that Luther was indeed proved wrong by Scripture alone. </p>
<p>Lastly, Luther is referred to as a great reformer. What did he reform? The Church was crying out to be reformed at that time, yet instead he broke away from it and started his own religion, deciding to deny many fundamental beliefs that all Christians had held since the time of Christ. Christ told His Apostles that He would be with them to the end of time, and if He were with them, He would be with the Church they were put in charge of. If that Church had been teaching incorrect doctrines for over 1500 years (as Luther clearly claimed by abolishing the Mass and most of the Sacraments), then Jesus was a liar. I hope you don&#8217;t believe that, because I sure don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
