<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Masaru Emoto Pseudoscience	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://conradaskland.com/blog/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/</link>
	<description>Music Director and Music Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg Jimmersonten		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-456811</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Jimmersonten]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/08/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-456811</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What about thunder? That is one of the harshest sounds out there, and it is very closely linked to water. In fact I would say that most water on earth has probably been pretty close to thunder before, is all water therefore damaged?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about thunder? That is one of the harshest sounds out there, and it is very closely linked to water. In fact I would say that most water on earth has probably been pretty close to thunder before, is all water therefore damaged?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: askland		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-181019</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[askland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/08/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-181019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PP Control - I am in agreement with your comments, and I very much appreciate how you point out this is not just a silly thing, it does have political overtones to it which are indeed sinister.

Which movie are you referring to?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PP Control &#8211; I am in agreement with your comments, and I very much appreciate how you point out this is not just a silly thing, it does have political overtones to it which are indeed sinister.</p>
<p>Which movie are you referring to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pro population control		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-180996</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pro population control]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/08/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-180996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I watched this movie with an open mind and was hoping it wouldn&#039;t be like &quot;what the %$#@ do we know&quot;, and at the end I was disappointed to see a ridiculous propagandized message... From a scientific standpoint, the idea that water assumes a 6 point star formation of crystals, and responds negatively/chaotically to the word &quot;Hitler&quot; is absurd. I was watching this movie with a great deal of respect up until that point and I realized the UN subcontext, the pro Israeli message, etc. and this is just another washed up (in water perhaps) political brainwashing that could have been such a powerful educational film. It&#039;s sad that these movies actually influence people in their lives... Alex Jones, David Icke, all the 9/11 movies with partial truths hidden by political agendas... Don&#039;t you people see that you could actually promote a positive constructive message if you stuck to 100% facts and proven truths? Politics are what divide man, not the quality of our water... Drop the religious BS and get with the facts. This movie gets a D minus. Started off good, but then used the introductions and beginning to present a political and religious statement without most viewers even noticing, but rather giving in and believing this nonsense. Let&#039;s see the proof that writing the word Hitler on a glass of water will make the water worse off. If my name happens to be Adolph, does that mean I&#039;m cursed for life too? This movie almost had me believing this nonsense! Why do they allow propaganda like this to be released? I don&#039;t even know what they were trying to convey, but when they stated the events of Jesus and so on to be facts, I started getting more suspicious... 

Watch the movie for yourself, and if you&#039;re religious (delusional) don&#039;t pay any attention to this comment. If you&#039;re an intelligent human being who questions what others try to force them to believe, watch the movie again and you&#039;ll see exactly what I&#039;m talking about.

-Anonymous]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched this movie with an open mind and was hoping it wouldn&#8217;t be like &#8220;what the %$#@ do we know&#8221;, and at the end I was disappointed to see a ridiculous propagandized message&#8230; From a scientific standpoint, the idea that water assumes a 6 point star formation of crystals, and responds negatively/chaotically to the word &#8220;Hitler&#8221; is absurd. I was watching this movie with a great deal of respect up until that point and I realized the UN subcontext, the pro Israeli message, etc. and this is just another washed up (in water perhaps) political brainwashing that could have been such a powerful educational film. It&#8217;s sad that these movies actually influence people in their lives&#8230; Alex Jones, David Icke, all the 9/11 movies with partial truths hidden by political agendas&#8230; Don&#8217;t you people see that you could actually promote a positive constructive message if you stuck to 100% facts and proven truths? Politics are what divide man, not the quality of our water&#8230; Drop the religious BS and get with the facts. This movie gets a D minus. Started off good, but then used the introductions and beginning to present a political and religious statement without most viewers even noticing, but rather giving in and believing this nonsense. Let&#8217;s see the proof that writing the word Hitler on a glass of water will make the water worse off. If my name happens to be Adolph, does that mean I&#8217;m cursed for life too? This movie almost had me believing this nonsense! Why do they allow propaganda like this to be released? I don&#8217;t even know what they were trying to convey, but when they stated the events of Jesus and so on to be facts, I started getting more suspicious&#8230; </p>
<p>Watch the movie for yourself, and if you&#8217;re religious (delusional) don&#8217;t pay any attention to this comment. If you&#8217;re an intelligent human being who questions what others try to force them to believe, watch the movie again and you&#8217;ll see exactly what I&#8217;m talking about.</p>
<p>-Anonymous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: askland		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-158923</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[askland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/08/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-158923</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here is a wikipedia page that has an overview of the Scientific Method:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

Would recommend reading that page in detail, but here are two excerpts:

Peer review evaluation

Scientific journals use a process of peer review, in which scientists&#039; manuscripts are submitted by editors of scientific journals to (usually one to three) fellow (usually anonymous) scientists familiar with the field for evaluation. The referees may or may not recommend publication, publication with suggested modifications, or, sometimes, publication in another journal. This serves to keep the scientific literature free of unscientific or crackpot work, helps to cut down on obvious errors, and generally otherwise improve the quality of the scientific literature.

Documentation and replication

    Main article: Reproducibility

Sometimes experimenters may make systematic errors during their experiments, unconsciously veer from the scientific method (Pathological science) for various reasons, or, in rare cases, deliberately falsify their results. Consequently, it is a common practice for other scientists to attempt to repeat the experiments in order to duplicate the results, thus further validating the hypothesis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a wikipedia page that has an overview of the Scientific Method:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method</a></p>
<p>Would recommend reading that page in detail, but here are two excerpts:</p>
<p>Peer review evaluation</p>
<p>Scientific journals use a process of peer review, in which scientists&#8217; manuscripts are submitted by editors of scientific journals to (usually one to three) fellow (usually anonymous) scientists familiar with the field for evaluation. The referees may or may not recommend publication, publication with suggested modifications, or, sometimes, publication in another journal. This serves to keep the scientific literature free of unscientific or crackpot work, helps to cut down on obvious errors, and generally otherwise improve the quality of the scientific literature.</p>
<p>Documentation and replication</p>
<p>    Main article: Reproducibility</p>
<p>Sometimes experimenters may make systematic errors during their experiments, unconsciously veer from the scientific method (Pathological science) for various reasons, or, in rare cases, deliberately falsify their results. Consequently, it is a common practice for other scientists to attempt to repeat the experiments in order to duplicate the results, thus further validating the hypothesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BS in Health Science?--please		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-158744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BS in Health Science?--please]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/08/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-158744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To what degree is &quot;true&quot; scientific experiment? Let go.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To what degree is &#8220;true&#8221; scientific experiment? Let go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eman		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-155636</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/08/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-155636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In regards to the second comment:

Having &quot;skipped some methods&quot; is absolutely critical. You seem to have missed the point completely. &quot;Dr&quot; Emoto is not a scientist and does not follow any scientific principles to come to his conclusions. His experiments are open to observer bias and other contaminants.  

It is besides the point whether Kristopher has done the experiments himself or not as he was making an analysis of Emoto&#039;s methods which are flawed. 

You have not demonstrated how Kristopher is less credible, you are just ranting. 

The James Randi Foundation has informed Emoto of the one million dollar prize to do his experiments, double blinded with no response. He as is everybody is interested in money but has not responded. Perhaps he is not confident in real scientific experiments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the second comment:</p>
<p>Having &#8220;skipped some methods&#8221; is absolutely critical. You seem to have missed the point completely. &#8220;Dr&#8221; Emoto is not a scientist and does not follow any scientific principles to come to his conclusions. His experiments are open to observer bias and other contaminants.  </p>
<p>It is besides the point whether Kristopher has done the experiments himself or not as he was making an analysis of Emoto&#8217;s methods which are flawed. </p>
<p>You have not demonstrated how Kristopher is less credible, you are just ranting. </p>
<p>The James Randi Foundation has informed Emoto of the one million dollar prize to do his experiments, double blinded with no response. He as is everybody is interested in money but has not responded. Perhaps he is not confident in real scientific experiments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kurt		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-144088</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/08/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-144088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ok this Kristopher seem more like a quack. He said he was going to try the same experiments on his web page you can find it here: http://www.is-masaru-emoto-for-real.com/   

Kristopher did not show us any photos of the same type for his analysis but rather cheap graphics diagrams. After the guy claims he is excited and interested in Emoto&#039;s work and that he is going to do the same experiment the guy just rants and complains trying to take words and drive it into us as the only reference that would make all his work considered unreal. It may be that since Emoto might have skipped some methods it seems like Kristopher gave up on the project and went straight to a conclusion.

Kristopher is LESS credible what a joke... and WHO  pays him to pretend to reproduce the research? out of his own pocket? People are a lot more smarter than these cheesy debunkers. My conclusion Kristopher just wasted our time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok this Kristopher seem more like a quack. He said he was going to try the same experiments on his web page you can find it here: <a href="http://www.is-masaru-emoto-for-real.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.is-masaru-emoto-for-real.com/</a>   </p>
<p>Kristopher did not show us any photos of the same type for his analysis but rather cheap graphics diagrams. After the guy claims he is excited and interested in Emoto&#8217;s work and that he is going to do the same experiment the guy just rants and complains trying to take words and drive it into us as the only reference that would make all his work considered unreal. It may be that since Emoto might have skipped some methods it seems like Kristopher gave up on the project and went straight to a conclusion.</p>
<p>Kristopher is LESS credible what a joke&#8230; and WHO  pays him to pretend to reproduce the research? out of his own pocket? People are a lot more smarter than these cheesy debunkers. My conclusion Kristopher just wasted our time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Patricia		</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-69942</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patricia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/2007/08/masaru-emoto-pseudoscience/#comment-69942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,

I totally agree with your words :) I have been saying the same thing to my friends ever since I read about Dr. Masaru Emotoï¿½s experiments. 

he is actually coming to my city, Barcelona in the next few days. He will be charging 50 Euros per person just for attending the so called &quot;conference&quot;....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I totally agree with your words 🙂 I have been saying the same thing to my friends ever since I read about Dr. Masaru Emotoï¿½s experiments. </p>
<p>he is actually coming to my city, Barcelona in the next few days. He will be charging 50 Euros per person just for attending the so called &#8220;conference&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
