<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vows &#8211; Conrad Askland</title>
	<atom:link href="https://conradaskland.com/blog/tag/vows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog</link>
	<description>Music Director and Music Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:22:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.8</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">53388445</site>	<item>
		<title>Martin Luther Tells Nuns OK to Lose Chastity</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/martin-luther-tells-nuns-ok-to-lose-chastity/</link>
					<comments>https://conradaskland.com/blog/martin-luther-tells-nuns-ok-to-lose-chastity/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[askland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Witches! the Musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6 August]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[August 6th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chastity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christ Our Savior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Convent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erika Flores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus Christ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Man And Woman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Messengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name Of Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weimarer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wittenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Womenfolk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/?p=3576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ok, so my post title is a little dramatic, but not far from the truth. On August 6th, 1524 Martin Luther writes an open letter to nuns which includes the words: &#8220;Though womenfolk are ashamed to admit to this, nevertheless Scripture and experience show that among many thousands there is not a one to whom [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so my post title is a little dramatic, but not far from the truth. On August 6th, 1524 Martin Luther writes an open letter to nuns which includes the words:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Though womenfolk are ashamed to admit to this, nevertheless Scripture and experience show that among many thousands there is not a one to whom God has given to remain in pure chastity. A woman has no control over herself.Â  God has made her body to be with man, to bear children&#8230; He has also ordered man and woman to be in marital union. Suffice it to say that no one needs to be ashamed over how God has made and created him, not having been given the high, rare mercy to do otherwise.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I can understand why the Catholic church does not care for him even some 500 years later. I can also understand why I find him sometimes frustrating, sometimes embarrassing, and sometimes utterly delightful&#8230;</p>
<p>The full letter appears below with the full passages in context translated from the original German.</p>
<p><span id="more-3576"></span></p>
<p>To Several Nuns<br />
by Martin Luther</p>
<p>From Wittenberg<br />
6 August 1524</p>
<p>Translated from<br />
Briefe aus dem Jahre 1524 No. 733 -756<br />
(Letters of the Year 1524 Nos. 733 &#8211; 756)</p>
<p>Weimarer Ausgabe</p>
<p>translated by<br />
Erika Bullmann Flores</p>
<p>To the free nuns, my dear sisters in Christ, written with a<br />
friendly disposition:</p>
<p>Mercy and peace in the name of Jesus Christ our Savior!</p>
<p>Dear sisters, I have received both of your letters and am aware<br />
of your concerns.Â  I would have answered you sooner if there had<br />
been messengers available, and I also have been very busy.</p>
<p>You are correct that there are two reasons for which life at the<br />
convent and vows may be forsaken: The one is where men&#8217;s laws<br />
and life within the order are being forced, where there is no<br />
free choice, where it is put upon the conscience as a burden.<br />
In such cases it is time to run away, leaving the convent and<br />
all it entails behind. If this is your situation, where you are<br />
not freely choosing the cloister, where your conscience is being<br />
forced, then call your friends.Â  Let them help you escape and,<br />
if the law allows, take care of you or provide for you.Â  If<br />
friends and parents are unwilling to help, obtain help from<br />
other goodly people, regardless of whether your parents become<br />
angry, die or recover.Â  For the soul&#8217;s well-being and God&#8217;s will<br />
are above all, as Christ says (Matth. 10:37): &#8220;Anyone who loves<br />
father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, if the sisters do allow you to leave, or at least let<br />
you freely read and hear the Word of God, then you must remain<br />
within and join them in their works, such as spinning cooking<br />
and the such, even though you have no confidence in it.</p>
<p>The second reason is the flesh: Though womenfolk are ashamed to<br />
admit to this, nevertheless Scripture and experience show that<br />
among many thousands there is not a one to whom God has given to<br />
remain in pure chastity. A woman has no control over herself.<br />
God has made her body to be with man, to bear children and to<br />
raise them as the words of Genesis 1:1 clearly state, as is<br />
evident by the members of the body ordered by God Himself.<br />
Therefore food and drink, sleep and wakefulness have all been<br />
created by God. Thus He has also ordered man and woman to be in<br />
marital union. Suffice it to say that no one needs to be ashamed<br />
over how God has made and created him, not having been given the<br />
high, rare mercy to do otherwise.Â  All this you will amply learn<br />
and read and hear proper sermons about when you come out. I have<br />
abundantly dealt with these issues in the book about monastic<br />
vows, avoiding men&#8217;s teachings, sermons about<br />
married life, item) in the Postil proven and established as<br />
true. If you read these, you will find enough instruction about<br />
various things, be it confession or whatever.</p>
<p>It is too much to write about here and not al all necessary,<br />
because I am convinced that you will leave the cloister, if one<br />
or both of these reasons pertain to you as you have written.<br />
Once there is freedom in choosing to join an order, anyone who<br />
is so inclined can join. Just so the Counsel of Bern in<br />
Switzerland has opened the most famous Cloister KÃ®nigfelden, and<br />
any maiden can freely leave, remain or move in, and they allow<br />
her to take with her whatever she has brought in. May the Lord<br />
bless you, and pray for me.</p>
<p>Written in Wittenberg,<br />
the day of Sixti Martyris<br />
(Aug. 6) 1524.</p>
<p>Martinus Luther</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://conradaskland.com/blog/martin-luther-tells-nuns-ok-to-lose-chastity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3576</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Martin Luther &#8211; Let Your Sins Be Strong</title>
		<link>https://conradaskland.com/blog/martin-luther-let-your-sins-be-strong/</link>
					<comments>https://conradaskland.com/blog/martin-luther-let-your-sins-be-strong/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[askland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Witches! the Musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[August 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear Conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concordia Publishing House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divine Majesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Martin Luther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentlemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georg Walch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Priests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schriften]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vows]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradaskland.com/blog/?p=3574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is it true that Martin Luther of the Reformation said &#8220;Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong.&#8221; Yes, it is. But the second half of that sentence was &#8220;but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world.&#8221; Here is that [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it true that Martin Luther of the Reformation said &#8220;Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong.&#8221; Yes, it is. But the second half of that sentence was &#8220;but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here is that passage in it&#8217;s original context; a letter from Luther to Melanchthon on August 1, 1521. If you like you can scroll directly to number paragraph thirteen for the complete passage.</p>
<p>This is also the letter where Martin Luther expresses his favor for allowing monks to marry.</p>
<p><span id="more-3574"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Let Your Sins Be Strong:</strong><br />
A Letter From Luther to Melanchthon<br />
Letter no. 99, 1 August 1521, From the Wartburg<br />
(Segment)<br />
Translated by<br />
Erika Bullmann Flores<br />
from: _Dr. Martin Luther&#8217;s Saemmtliche Schriften_<br />
Dr, Johannes Georg Walch, Ed.<br />
(St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, N.D.),<br />
Vol. 15,cols. 2585-2590.</p>
<p>Of course, you can only know and absolve those sins which have been<br />
confessed to you; sins which have not been confessed to you, you<br />
neither need to know nor can you absolve them. That is reaching too<br />
high, dear gentlemen.&#8221;</p>
<p>You cannot convince me that the same is true for the vows made by<br />
priests and monks.Â  For I am very concerned about the fact that the<br />
order of priesthood was instituted by God as a free one. Not so that<br />
of the monks who chose their position voluntarily, even though I have<br />
almost come to the conclusion that those who have entered into that<br />
state at an age prior to their manhood, or are currently at that<br />
stage, may secede with a clear conscience. I am hesitant, however,<br />
with a judgment about those who have been in this state for a long<br />
time and have grown old in it.</p>
<p>2. By the way, St. Paul very freely speaks about the priests (1.Tim:<br />
4, ff), that devils have forbidden them to marry; and St. Paul&#8217;s<br />
voice is the voice of the divine majesty. Therefore, I do not doubt<br />
that they must depend on him to such a degree that even though they<br />
agreed to this interdiction of the devil at the time, now&#8211;having<br />
realized with whom they made their contract&#8211;they can cheerfully<br />
break this contract.</p>
<p>3. This interdiction by the devil, which is clearly shown by God&#8217;s<br />
Word, urges and compels me to sanction the actions of the Bishop of<br />
Kemberg. For God does not lie nor deceive when He says that this is<br />
an interdiction from the devil.Â  If a contract has been made with the<br />
devil it must not endure since it was made in godless error against<br />
God and was damned and repudiated by God.Â  For He says very clearly<br />
(1. Tim. 4:1 Vulg.) that those spirits are in error who are the<br />
originators of the interdictions.</p>
<p>4. Why do you hesitate to join this divine judgment against the gates<br />
of hell? That is not how it was with the oath of the children of<br />
Israel which they gave to the Gibeons.Â  They had it in their laws<br />
that they must offer peace or accept peace offered to them, and<br />
accept into their midst proselytes and those who adhered to their<br />
customs.Â  All this took place. Nothing happened there against the<br />
Lord or by the advice of spirits. For even though in the beginning<br />
they murmured, later on they approved.</p>
<p>5. In addition, consider that the state of being unmarried is only a<br />
human statute and can be readily lifted. Therefore any Christian can<br />
do this.Â  I would make this statement even if the interdiction had<br />
not come from a devil, but from a devout person.Â  However, because<br />
there is no such statement by God concerning the monks, I am<br />
therefore not certain that I should make the same pronouncement<br />
concerning them. For I would not dare to presume, neither advice<br />
another to do so.Â  Would God that we could do this, though, in order<br />
to prevent someone from becoming a monk, or leaving his order during<br />
the years of his virility.Â  For we are to avoid vexations if there is<br />
no relevant scriptural passage available to us, even when dealing<br />
with things which are permitted.</p>
<p>6. Good old Carlstadt is also citing St. Paul (1 Tim.5:9-11), to let<br />
go of the younger widows and select 60-year-olds, wish to God this<br />
could be demonstrated. Quite easily someone might say that the<br />
Apostle referred to the future, while in reference to the past (V.12)<br />
they are condemned because they have broken their first troth.<br />
Therefore this expression has come to naught and cannot be a<br />
dependable basis for the conscience. For that is what we are<br />
searching for.Â  Moreover, this reasoning that it is better to be<br />
married than to burn with vain desire (1 Cor.7:9), or to prevent the<br />
sins of immorality (1 Cor.7:2), by entering into marriage while<br />
committing the sin of the broken troth, that is nothing but common-<br />
sense.Â  We want the scripture and the witness of God&#8217;s will.Â  Who<br />
knows if the one who is very enthusiastic today will still be so<br />
tomorrow?</p>
<p>7. I would not have allowed marriage for priests for the sole reason<br />
of &#8220;burning&#8221; had not St. Paul called this interdiction devilish and<br />
hypocritical, condemned by God. Even without the burning he urged<br />
that this unmarried status be cast aside simply for the fear of God.<br />
However, it is necessary to discuss these things more thoroughly. For<br />
I too would love to come to the aid of the monks and nuns. I very<br />
much pity these wretched human beings, these young men and girls who<br />
suffer defilement and burning.</p>
<p>8. Concerning the two elements of the Holy Supper I will not give an<br />
example, but give testimony with Christ&#8217;s words. Carlstadt does not<br />
show that those who have received only one element have sinned, or<br />
not sinned. I am concerned that Christ did not command either one of<br />
the two, just as He does not command baptism if the tyrant or the<br />
world withhold the water.Â  So also the violence of persecution<br />
separates men and women, which God forbids to separate, neither do<br />
they agree to be separated. Therefore, neither do godfearing hearts<br />
agree that they should be robbed of one of the elements. However,<br />
those who do agree and approve: who can deny that these are not<br />
Christians but Papists who are sinning.</p>
<p>9. There HE does not demand it, and here the tyrant oppresses, I<br />
therefore cannot agree that those who receive only one element are<br />
sinning.Â  For who can exert power to take something when the tyrant<br />
is not willing?Â  Therefore it is only common-sense which observes<br />
here that Christ&#8217;s institution is not adhered to.Â  Scripture makes no<br />
definition by which we could declare this act a sin.Â  It is Christ&#8217;s<br />
institution, given in freedom, which cannot be incarcerated as a<br />
whole or in part.</p>
<p>10. It happened to Donatus, the martyr, where several people could<br />
not participate because the cup broke or the wine was spilled. What<br />
if this happens and there is no other wine available? There are other<br />
similar situations. In short, because Scripture does not speak of sin<br />
here, I therefore say there is no sin involved.</p>
<p>11. I am quite pleased, though, that you are re-establishing Christ&#8217;s<br />
method. For it was just that which I planned to take up with you<br />
first of all upon my return to you.Â  For now we recognize this<br />
tyranny and can oppose it, in order not to be forced to receive only<br />
one of the elements.</p>
<p>12. From here on I will no longer conduct private mass. Rather we<br />
should pray God to give us more of His Spirit.Â  For I am expecting<br />
that the Lord will soon ravish Germany&#8211;which she deserves because of<br />
her unbelief, godlessness and hate of the Gospel.Â  However, we shall<br />
be blamed for this chastisement, as we are made out to be heretics<br />
who have provoked God to this action. We shall be scorned by the<br />
people and disdained by the nation.Â  Those, however, will make<br />
excuses for their sins, through which He will manifest that the hard-<br />
hearted do not become godly neither by mercy nor wrath. Let it<br />
happen, let the will of the Lord be done. Amen!</p>
<p><strong> 13.</strong> If you are a preacher of mercy, do not preach an imaginary but<br />
the true mercy.Â  If the mercy is true, you must therefore bear the<br />
true, not an imaginary sin.Â  God does not save those who are only<br />
imaginary sinners.Â  Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong, but let<br />
your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the<br />
victor over sin, death, and the world.Â  We will commit sins while we<br />
are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides.Â  We,<br />
however, says Peter (2. Peter 3:13) are looking forward to a new<br />
heaven and a new earth where justice will reign.Â  It suffices that<br />
through God&#8217;s glory we have recognized the Lamb who takes away the<br />
sin of the world. No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to<br />
kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day.Â  Do you think<br />
such an exalted Lamb paid merely a small price with a meager<br />
sacrifice for our sins?Â  Pray hard for you are quite a sinner.</p>
<p>On the day of the Feast of St. Peter the Apostle, 1521</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://conradaskland.com/blog/martin-luther-let-your-sins-be-strong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3574</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
