HSM – Get Your Head In The Game

Here is a sample video of “Keep Your Head In The Game” from Disney’s High School Musical. Would suggest all cast members view this in preparation for our production in 2007.

More Musician Jokes

What’s the difference between a puppy and a singer?
Eventually the puppy stops whining.

.
Why do bands have bassists?
To translate for the drummers.

.
How do you know when a singer is at your door?
They can’t find the key.

.
How many bassists are needed to screw in a lightbulb?
None, the keyboardist does it with his left hand.

.
What do a guitarist and a lawsuit have in common?
Everyone is relieved when the case is closed.

.
Two musicians are sitting in a car. Who’s driving?
The policeman.

.
What is a relative minor?
A country & western musician’s girlfriend.

.
The difference between a singer and a terrorist?
You can negotiate with a terrorist.

.
What does M.I.D.I. mean?
Musician In Debt Instantly.

.
Difference between guitarist and harmonica player?
Guitarist can yell at the band during his solo.

.
Difference between a bassoon and oboe?
You can hit a baseball farther with a bassoon.

.
And finally…A young boy says to his mom “When I grow up I’d like to be a musician”. She says, “Now Tommy, you know you can’t do both”.

Censorship

……..they first came for the Communists,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant.

Then they came for me —
and by that time no one was left to speak up.

– Pastor Martin Niemöller
In reference to WWII

Who Attempts Censorship?
From the American Library Association
In most instances, a censor is a sincerely concerned individual who believes that censorship can improve society, protect children, and restore what the censor sees as lost moral values. But under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, each of us has the right to read, view, listen to, and disseminate constitutionally protected ideas, even if a censor finds those ideas offensive.

How Do Censors Justify Their Demands That Material Be Suppressed?

Censors might sincerely believe that certain materials are so offensive, or present ideas that are so hateful and destructive to society, that they simply must not see the light of day. Others are worried that younger or weaker people will be badly influenced by bad ideas, and will do bad things as a result. Still others believe that there is a very clear distinction between ideas that are right and morally uplifting, and ideas that are wrong and morally corrupting, and wish to ensure that society has the benefit of their perception. They believe that certain individuals, certain institutions, even society itself, will be endangered if particular ideas are disseminated without restriction. What censors often don’t consider is that, if they succeed in suppressing the ideas they don’t like today, others may use that precedent to suppress the ideas they do like tomorrow.

What Are The Most Frequently Censored Materials?

Throughout history, books have been challenged for many reasons, including political content, sexual expression, or language offensive to some people’s racial, cultural, or ethnic background, gender or sexuality, or political or religious beliefs. Materials considered heretical, blasphemous, seditious, obscene or inappropriate for children have often been censored.

Since the dawn of recorded human expression, people have been burned at the stake, forced to drink poison, crucified, ostracized and vilified for what they wrote and believed.

WHAT WIKIPEDIA IS NOT
Wikipedia and Censorship
Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive. Anyone reading Wikipedia can edit an article and the changes are displayed instantaneously without any checking to ensure appropriateness, so Wikipedia cannot guarantee that articles or images are tasteful to all users or adhere to specific social or religious norms or requirements. While obviously inappropriate content (such as an irrelevant link to a shock site) is usually removed immediately, some articles may include objectionable text, images, or links if they are relevant to the content (such as the article about pornography) and provided they do not violate any of our existing policies (especially Neutral point of view), nor the law of the U.S. state of Florida, where Wikipedia’s servers are hosted.

Wikipedia – Author would like to point out that Wikipedia is currently the largest single repository of public accessed and updated information (Google only directs to information sources, it does not contain it with user input). And please note, Wikipedia is not censored. It is regarded by many as the “real” source for the facts.

LINKS:

Censorship – American Civil Liberties Union
Excerpt: Censorship, the suppression of words, images, or ideas that are “offensive,” happens whenever some people succeed in imposing their personal political or moral values on others. Censorship can be carried out by the government as well as private pressure groups. Censorship by the government is unconstitutional.

Censorship – Global Internet Library Campaign
Excerpt: Censorship — the control of the information and ideas circulated within a society — has been a hallmark of dictatorships throughout history. In the 20th Century, censorship was achieved through the examination of books, plays, films, television and radio programs, news reports, and other forms of communication for the purpose of altering or suppressing ideas found to be objectionable or offensive. The rationales for censorship have varied, with some censors targeting material deemed to be indecent or obscene; heretical or blasphemous; or seditious or treasonous. Thus, ideas have been suppressed under the guise of protecting three basic social institutions: the family, the church, and the state.

DEFINITIONS OF CENSORSHIP

Censor: One who supervises conduct and morals: as a) an official who examines materials (as publications or films) for objectionable matter; b) an official (as in time of war) who reads communications (as letters) and deletes material considered harmful to the interests of his organization. Censorship: The institution, system or practice of censoring; the actions or practices of censors; esp : censorial control exercised repressively.
–Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary

Censorship: The use of the state and other legal or official means to restrict speech.
–Culture Wars, Documents from the Recent Controversies in the Arts, edited by Richard Boltons

In general, censorship of books is a supervision of the press in order to prevent any abuse of it. In this sense, every lawful authority, whose duty it is to protect its subjects from the ravages of a pernicious press, has the right of exercising censorship of books.
–The Catholic Encyclopedia (a publication of the Catholic Church)

What Is Censorship? Censorship is the suppression of ideas and information that certain persons — individuals, groups or government officials — find objectionable or dangerous. It is no more complicated than someone saying, “Don’t let anyone read this book, or buy that magazine, or view that film, because I object to it!” Censors try to use the power of the state to impose their view of what is truthful and appropriate, or offensive and objectionable, on everyone else. Censors pressure public institutions, like libraries, to suppress and remove from public access information they judge inappropriate or dangerous, so that no one else has the chance to read or view the material and make up their own minds about it. The censor wants to prejudge materials for everyone.

For the ALA, technically censorship means the “The Removal of material from open access by government authority.” The ALA also distinguishes various levels of incidents in respect to materials in a library which may or may not lead to censorship: Inquiry, Expression of Concern, Complaint, Attack, and Censorship.
–The American Library Association
The word “censorship” means “prior restraint” of First Amendment rights by government.
–Morality in Media (Morality in Media is “a national, not-for-profit, interfaith organization established in 1962 to combat obscenity and uphold decency standards in the media.”)
Censorship
1. The denial of freedom of speech or freedom of the press.
2. The review of books, movies, etc., to prohibit publication and distribution, usually for reasons of morality or state security.
–Oran’s Dictionary of Law
Censorship: official restriction of any expression believed to threaten the political, social, or moral order.
–Encyclopedia.Com

Censorship – the prevention of publication, transmission, or exhibition of material considered undesirable for the general public to possess or be exposed to.
–Fast Times’ Political Dictionary (Fast Times is “a nonpartisan publication on contemporary world affairs & media with no political, ideological, or religious affiliation of any kind.”)

Censorship: the cyclical suppression, banning, expurgation, or editing by an individual, institution, group or government that enforce or influence its decision against members of the public — of any written or pictorial materials which that individual, institution, group or government deems obscene and “utterly” without redeeming social value,” as determined by “contemporary community standards.”
–Chuck Stone, Professor of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of North Carolina

Censorship is a word of many meanings. In its broadest sense it refers to suppression of information, ideas, or artistic expression by anyone, whether government officials, church authorities, private pressure groups, or speakers, writers, and artists themselves. It may take place at any point in time, whether before an utterance occurs, prior to its widespread circulation, or by punishment of communicators after dissemination of their messages, so as to deter others from like expression. In its narrower, more legalistic sense, censorship means only the prevention by official government action of the circulation of messages already produced. Thus writers who “censor” themselves before putting words on paper, for fear of failing to sell their work, are not engaging in censorship in this narrower sense, nor are those who boycott sponsors of disliked television shows.
–Academic American Encyclopedia

Censorship: supervision and control of the information and ideas circulated within a society. In modern times, censorship refers to the examination of media including books, periodicals, plays, motion pictures, and television and radio programs for the purpose of altering or suppressing parts thought to be offensive. The offensive material may be considered immoral or obscene, heretical or blasphemous, seditious or treasonable, or injurious to the national security.
–Encarta Encyclopedia

EARLY THEATER CENSORSHIP
William Shakespeare Censored and Banned

For much of the past five hundred years restrictions on public theatrical performance were perhaps the pre-eminent manifestation of censorship.

That was because the theatre (later replaced as a bugaboo by film and broadcasting) was perceived as a uniquely powerful mechanism for influencing emotions and for the delivery of seditious ideas. It was often a space in which people of all social orders mixed promiscuously. And, perhaps as importantly, it was amenable to censorship through –

* licencing of commercial venues
* prohibitions on commercial performances outside those venues
* pre-performance examination and licensing of texts, with subsequent monitoring of theatrical productions.

In the United Kingdom, for example, licensing of commercial venues and vetting of scripts was in place by the time of Elizabeth I. Stage works were subject to pre-production censorship by the Lord Chamberlain (an officer of the Royal Household) under the Stage Licensing Act 1737, an enactment that with amendments remained in force until 1968 and resulted in curiosities such as a ban on performance of Shakespeare’s King Lear from 1788 to 1820. The legislation is discussed in Vincent Liesenfeld’s The Licensing Act of 1737 (Madison: Uni of Wisconsin Press 1984).

China Defends Internet Censorship

On this day, most results of Google search for “business and censorship” concern China’s censorship of internet access. They seem fit to censor ideas that might pollute the general public’s mind – Like Tiananmen Square.

Northwest Blogger Website

A website dedicated to Northwest bloggers at NWBloggers.com.

.
You can open a free account with them. The website says although most members are conservative leaning, they are open to other views. I guess that’s a general guideline. Open to bloggers from Washington, Oregon, Northern California and outlying areas, as well as bloggers who feel they have a connection to the Pacific Northwest.

Rocky Horror Picture Show Added to National Film Registry

January 2006

http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/0601/nfr.html

Librarian of Congress James H. Billington announced his annual selection of 25 motion pictures to be added to the National Film Registry in December 2005. This group of titles brings the total number of films placed on the registry since its creation by Congress in 1988 to 425.

Under the terms of the National Film Preservation Act, each year the Librarian of Congress names 25 “culturally, historically or aesthetically” significant motion pictures to the registry. The list is designed to reflect the full breadth and diversity of America’s film heritage, thus increasing public awareness of the richness of American cinema and the need for its preservation. In making the announcement, the Librarian said, “By preserving American films, we safeguard a significant element of American creativity and our cultural history for the enjoyment and education of future generations.”

“The Rocky Horror Picture Show” (1975)
The ultimate “midnight movie,” “Rocky Horror” revolutionized prevailing notions of audience participation during film screenings. Words to remember: “It’s astounding, time is fleeting, madness takes its toll.”

****

Mr. Askland would like to point out that the US Supreme Court has defined legal censorship for material that is “Obscene” – In order to qualify legally as obscene the material must be devoid of any artistic, aesthetic or scientific value. Since the RHPS has now been added to the National Film Registry, it would not appear to meet the legal definition of obscene.

Norwegian Christmas Song – Jeg Er Sa Glad

Jeg Er Saa glad was composed in 1859 by Peder Knudsen with lyrics by Marie Wexelsen. For me it is the pinnacle of Norwegian Christmas songs both because of it’s popularity and simplicity.

I remember very well as a young child in Seattle attending the Sons of Norway Sumnerslaget Christmas celebration. Hundreds of salty Norwegians would sing this song in chorus. What a beautiful sound that I quite took for granted.

Lyrics in English and Norwegian Posted Below
Jeg Er Sa Glad -Sheet Music.pdf
Jeg-er-sa-glad.mp3 – Melody Sample
jeg-er-sa-glad.mp3
This song is performed well by choirs from both St. Olaf and Pacific Lutheran University. You will find CD’s easily online if interested.
Imagine my utter shock to see these lyrics posted on a website under the general classification of “Scandinavian”. You should know that although us Norwegians are quiet, boring and stale – we are fiercely proud of our heritage. Do not count the Vikings out as they may emerge again for global domination. Norskes do not consider “Swedish” and “Danish” as a complete trilogy of our heritage as many assume. We are our own people – thick headed, muleish and the bravest of the brave.

You should also know that although Ballard, WA (largely Norwegian population) is a suburb of Seattle, very few Norskes will admit this fact. Norskes refer to Seattle as a suburb of Ballard.

PERFORMANCE
Jeg Er Sa Glad is usually written in 3/4 or 6/8 time, but has a gentle lilt that suggests 6/8. Think of falling snow, gently swishing your skis down the slope side to side – and you will have the correct feel for this traditional Norwegian Christmas song.

.

NORWEGIAN LYRICS
Jeg er så glad hver julekveld,
for da ble Jesus født,
da lyste stjernen som en sol,
og engler sang så søtt.

Det lille barn i Betlehem,
han var en konge stor
som kom fra himlens høye slott
ned til vår arme jord.

Nå bor han høyt i himmerik,
han er Guds egen Sønn,
men husker alltis på de små
og hører deres bønn.

Jeg er så glad hver julekveld,
da synger vi hans pris:
da åpner han for alle små
sitt søte paradis.

Da tenner moder alle lys,
så ingen krok er mørk;
hun sier stjernen lyste så
i hele verdens ørk.

Hun sier at den lyser enn
og slukkes aldri ut,
og hvis den skinner på min vei,
da kommer jeg til Gud.

Jeg holder av vår julekveld
og av den herre Krist
og at han elsker meg igjen,
det vet jeg ganske visst.

ENGLISH LYRICS TRANSLATION

1. I am so glad each Christmas Eve,
The night of Jesus’ birth!
Then like the sun the Star shone forth,1
And angels sang on earth.

2. The little Child in Bethlehem,
He was a King indeed!
For He came down from heaven above
To help a world in need.

3. He dwells again in heaven’s realm,
The Son of God today;
And still He loves His little ones
And hears them when they pray.

4. I am so glad on Christmas Eve!
His praises then I sing;
He opens then for every child
The palace of the King.2

5. When mother trims the Christmas tree
Which fills the room with light,
She tells me of the wondrous Star
That made the dark world bright.

6. She says the Star is shining still,
And never will grow dim;
And if it shines upon my way,
It leads me up to Him.

7. And so I love each Christmas Eve
And I love Jesus, too;
And that He loves me every day
I know so well is true.

Words: “Jeg Er Saa Glad Hver Julekveld,” Marie Wexelsen, 1859; translated from Norwegian to English by Peter Andrew Sveeggen (1881-1959). Wexelsen (1832-1911) published three children’s books, among them Ketil, en Julegave for De Smaa (“Ketil, a Christmas Gift for Little Ones”), where this Christmas carol introduced a longer story. At that time she entitled it “The Child’s Christmas Carol.”

Music: “Jeg Er Saa glad” (“Christmas Eve”), Peder Knudsen (1819-1863), 1859

The First Thanksgiving Propoganda

pilgrim1.JPGI hesitate to write about political and religious topics on my blog because there will always be someone offended; but I cannot resist.

When I was in grade school around Thanksgiving time we would wear black and white pilgrim hats we made from construction paper. We wore them proudly as we sang in concert “This land is your land, this land is my land….” – And we had images of Indians sitting with the pilgrims at the first Thanksgiving enjoying each other’s company. The Indians helped the pilgrims to survive, which was a good thing since the European settlers were much more advanced in their culture. We know those settlers started colonies that would later overtake the primitive Indian culture, but that was the way it had to be since the Europeans had a more advanced culture and theology. The Pilgrims were able to save many of the Indians, which was a good thing since most of the Indians were doomed to hell for not being Christian. The Indians had spent thousands of years in America, but had done nothing with it. They had their time and squandered it. We made America into something the primitive Indians could not acheive, saved their souls and gave the tribes land to continue their culture if they wished – which would be a mistake, but if they want to continue being backward, then that’s their choice. We can’t help it they didn’t advance. Still to this day Indians cry in their beer over it. Oh well, maybe you should have advanced rather than building wigwams and shooting deer for two thousand years.

And THAT was my childhood understanding of the roots of American culture. How twisted and offensive is that?

The reason this all comes back to me is from a CNN article last week, where some teachers are teaching Thanksgiving to children in a different fashion. They are walking up to children’s desks and taking a pencil off it, then a book, then a child’s shoe, then a coat – when the children complain the teacher responds “But I discovered it.” The children cry, then the teacher explains early American history from a Native American perspective. This has drawn complaints from many, as well as praise. For my vote, I praise it.

History has shown us that when a more advance culture comes in contact with one that is less advanced; the more advanced culture will over-run the other culture. This might be a comment on the dark side of human nature. If you want to extrapolate that fact out, let’s hope that if an alien culture comes in contact with Earth at some point in the future they do not share this human characteristic.

The modern Native American nation as far as I can see is not bent on revenge, but they are finally in a position to stand up and claim their cultural homestead. The stereotype of Native Americans living on the dole while drunk on the reservation is giving way to organized groups of Native American attorneys and professionals guiding the funds of the “Indian Casinos” to reinstating their culture, what is left of it, for future generations.

Why didn’t they do this before? My understanding is that the Indian Nation was given sovreign rights under the Reagan administration, which allowed the building of casinos. This idea took a while to catch on – but the financial success of these spread like wildfire. I would be as you’re reading this, you know of an Indian Casino in your vicinity that has been build within the last 10 years. Yes? Ka-ching.

So what changed my perspective? I think I am just in the wave with everyone else, a slow change in social consciousness, a paradigm shift. What was once our pride and joy of an expanding nation, some of us now look on as the decimation of an entire culture. And yes, a culture that had a great deal to teach us about many things, but our forefathers were not in a place to listen.

Sometimes I think years of performing in bars and casinos impeded my sense of the world. But I DID get a chance to spend a lot of time on reservations. While playing in country bands I was in Flagstaff for several weeks and that was my first conversations directly with Native Americans. They gave me “Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee” to read – a horrific account of the destruction of the Native Americans, very different from How The West Was Won. I would suggest this book to anyone to read; if you are white I think it will break your heart, as it did mine. It might be the only book I’ve read that actually made me cry.

Then almost ten years playing with Freddy Fender we spent quite a bit of time playing in Indian casinos. Because Freddy was a name act, we were often treated to behind the scenes tours of the reservations and got the inside scoop from a Native American perspective. There was a comraderie I think because Freddy was Hispanic, and we weren’t vied as a “white” group.

I recount this just to let you know the deep, deep pain present in the Native American communities. Maybe I’m stating the obvious, but as a child I had the understanding these things were from a different age; all taken care of and done in the 1800’s – and we lived in a different world. No, we live in the same world, and the repercussions from those actions are still very present – albeit seemingly dormant.

So I’ve wandered from Pilgrims to the late 1800’s. What’s my point? My point is to be aware that our history is strewn with propoganda, and what we think may be true, may be quite a spin. I like very much the new attitude toward the teaching of history – I do not see the heavy propoganda with current school children like I experienced as a child. Thank God for the History Channel and the internet, which have both provided us with more information than the black and white History class films of our youth.

I don’t have any answers to what could have been done differently – for that I fall short. And I admit I like my Thanksgiving celebrations with family, and I like American culture, grassroots Christianity and our way of life. But I keep a thought at all times in the back of my mind – to realize that the world around me may not be how I see it, and that the glasses I wear give a different view than someone elses. I could very well be wearing the wrong glasses at any time.

And my note to missionaries, which I don’t pretend will be received with warmth: I think a world of good would be realized to immerse yourself in a foreign culture to understand and absorb that culture, without the predetermination that you are their to change and enlighten it.

I hope that’s a thought for all of us to consider.

MORE READING
Pilgrim Hall Museum

Wikipedia on Thanksgiving

History Channel – First Thanksgiving
This is a great documentary if you can watch it
IMPACT OF BOOK – BURY MY HEART AT WOUNDED KNEE

It is difficult to overstate the impact of the book. Prior to its publication in 1970, the dominant images of the period were of noble settlers threatened by savage Indians and defended by the 7th Cavalry. The book brought to the public’s attention the other side of the story: that the original owners of the land were systematically massacred, betrayed and forced onto only those scraps of land that the more numerous and technologically superior conquerors disdained.

One strength of the book is its strong documentation to original sources. Its message may not have been a welcome one, but it came loaded with facts. The other strength is that each chapter forms a story, compelling as any fiction and far more interesting than academic treatises.

THE MAYFLOWER COMPACT
Signed by Pilgrim Leaders

In the name of God, Amen. We whose names are under-written, the loyal subjects of our dread sovereign Lord, King James, by the grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland King, Defender of the Faith, etc.

Having undertaken, for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith, and honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, and one of another, covenant and combine our selves together into a civil body politic, for our better ordering and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the Colony, unto which we promise all due submission and obedience. In witness whereof we have hereunder subscribed our names at Cape Cod, the eleventh of November [New Style, November 21], in the year of the reign of our sovereign lord, King James, of England, France, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth. Anno Dom. 1620.

Ave Maria by JS Bach

1760-08-wdheq-if-300.jpgI received a note saying someone was desperately trying to find history of the JS Bach “Ave Maria” and was not finding anything online.

Bach never wrote the Ave Maria. Aha! It was Gounod that took a prelude by JS Bach, and then put a melody on top with lyrics to the Ave Maria.

JS Bach was an unwitting partner in the collaboration. Charles Gounod was a French composer who lived from 1818-1883. Read the Wikipedia Page on Charles Gounod. So google “Gounod Ave Maria” and you’ll find it readily available from most sheet music suppliers.
Here’s a bit of the music to refresh your memory:

bagoavma-excerpt.gif

Photo of composer Charles Gonoud

180px-charles_gounod.jpg

Musical settings of the Ave Maria

The Ave Maria has been set to music numerous times. Among the most famous settings is the version by Charles Gounod (1859), adding melody and words to Johann Sebastian Bach’s first prelude from the Well-Tempered Clavier. Antonín Dvořák’s version was composed in 1877. Another setting of Ave Maria was written by Giuseppe Verdi for his 1887 opera Otello. Russian composer César Cui, who was raised Roman Catholic, set the text at least three times: as the “Ave Maria,” op. 34, for 1 or 2 women’s voices with piano or harmonium (1886), and as part of two of his operas: Le Flibustier (premiered 1894) and Mateo Falcone (1907).

This text was also very often set by composers in the Renaissance, including Jacques Arcadelt, Josquin Desprez, Orlando di Lasso, and Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina. Before the Council of Trent there were actually different versions of the text, so the earlier composers in the period sometimes set different versions than the ones shown above. Josquin, for example, himself set more than one version of the Ave Maria. Here is an example of a text set by Josquin which begins with the first six words above, but continues with a poem in rhymed couplets: